Wagenaar, H. (2011). “A beckon to the makings, workings and doings of human beings”: The critical pragmatism of John Forester. Public Administration Review, 71(2), 293–298. Cite

Shyman, E. (2011). A Comparison of the Concepts of Democracy and Experience in a Sample of Major Works by Dewey and Freire. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 43(10), 1035–1046. ehh. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00625.x Cite

Talisse, R. B. (2011). A Farewell to Deweyan Democracy. Political Studies, 59(3), 509–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00860.x Cite

James, S. M. (1993). A possible Black feminist link to social transformation? Theorizing Black Feminisms: The Visionary Pragmatism of Black Women, 44. Cite

Glassman, M., Erdem, G., & Bartholomew, M. (2013). Action Research and Its History as an Adult Education Movement for Social Change. Adult Education Quarterly, 63(3), 272–288. ehh. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713612471418 Cite

Heikkinen, H. L. T., Huttunen, R., & Syrjälä, L. (2007). Action research as narrative: five principles for validation. Educational Action Research, 15(1), 5–19. ehh. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790601150709 Cite

Finger, M., & Asun, J. M. (2001). Adult Education at the Crossroads: Learning our way out. Zed Books and NIACE. https://studydirect.sussex.ac.uk/course/view.php?id=21916&topic=8 Cite

Frega, R. (2014). Between pragmatism and critical theory: Social philosophy today. Human Studies, 37(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-013-9290-0 Cite

Hildebrand, D. L. (2003). Beyond realism and antirealism: John Dewey and the neopragmatists. Vanderbilt University Press. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=N9PWAAAAMAAJ Cite

Antonio, R. J., & Kellner, D. (1992). Communication, modernity, and democracy in Habermas and Dewey. Symbolic Interaction, 15(3), 277–297. Cite

Dewey, J., Moore, A. W., Brown, H. C., Mead, G. H., Bode, B. H., Stuart, H. W., Tufts, J. H., & Kallen, H. M. (1917). Creative intelligence: Essays in the pragmatic attitude. H. Holt. https://ia802705.us.archive.org/9/items/creativeintellig00dewe/creativeintellig00dewe.pdf Cite

Midtgarden, T. (2012). Critical Pragmatism: Dewey’s social philosophy revisited. European Journal of Social Theory, 15(4), 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431011432373 Cite

Lovejoy, A. O. (1920). Critical realism: A co-operative study of the problem of knowledge. In D. Drake, A. O. Lovejoy, J. B. Pratt, A. K. Rogers, G. Santayana, R. W. Sellars, & C. A. Strong (Eds.), Pragmatism versus the pragmatist (pp. 35–84). http://www.archive.org/stream/essayscriticalre00unknuoft#page/34/mode/2up Cite

Shalin, D. M. (n.d.). Critical theory and the pragmatist challenge. http://cdclv.unlv.edu//pragmatism/shalin_ct.pdf Cite

Linh Chi, V. O., Mounoud, E., & Rose, J. (2012). Dealing with the opposition of rigor and relevance from Dewey’s pragmatist perspective. Management, 15(4), 367–390. buh. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26db%3dbuh%26AN%3d85136796%26site%3deds-live&group=trial Cite

Dewey, J. (1923). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Macmillan. Cite

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. The Macmillan Co. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jRFWAJJVE_EC Cite

Honneth, A. (1998). Democracy as reflexive cooperation: John Dewey and the theory of democracy today. Political Theory, 26(6), 763–783. Cite

Fesmire, S. (2014). Dewey. Routledge. Cite

Hildebrand, D. L. (2008). Dewey: A beginner’s guide. Oneworld Publications. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=sBHLJgwyuakC Cite

Willower, D. J. (1994). Dewey’s theory of inquiry and reflective administration. Journal of Educational Administration, 32(1), 05–22. Cite

Hansen, D. T. (2002). Dewey’s Conception of an Environment for Teaching and Learning. Curriculum Inquiry, 32(3), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-873X.00228 Cite

Colapietro, V. (2004). Doing—and undoing—the done thing: Dewey and Bourdieu on habituation, agency, and transformation. Contemporary Pragmatism, 1(2), 65–93. Cite

Dewey, J. (1938). Education and experience. Simon and Schuster. Cite

Zajda, J. I. (2001). Education and Society. James Nicholas Publishers. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=FPbcdfMFrckC Cite

Ghiraldelli, P. (n.d.). Educational Theory : Herbart, Dewey, Freire and Postmodernists. http://eepat.net/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=educational_theory.pdf Cite

Stewart, A. F. (1997). Elements of Knowledge: Pragmatism, Logic, and Inquiry. Vanderbilt University Press. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=0ntMa55fA6wC Cite

Dewey, J., Hester, D. M., & Talisse, R. B. (1916). Essays in experimental logic. SIU Press. Cite

Dewey, J. (1986). Experience and education. 50, 241–252. Cite

Dewey, J. (1925). Experience and nature. George Allen & Unwin Ltd. Cite

Cohan, A., & Howlett, C. F. (2017). GLOBAL CONFLICTS SHATTERED WORLD PEACE: JOHN DEWEY’S INFLUENCE ON PEACE EDUCATORS AND PRACTITIONERS. Education & Culture, 33(1), 59–88. ehh. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26db%3dehh%26AN%3d124508878%26site%3deds-live&group=trial Cite

Aboulafia, M., Bookman, M., & Kemp, C. (2012). Habermas and Pragmatism. Taylor & Francis. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=gi0VwiGNXKMC Cite

Greene, J. C., & Hall, J. N. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Dialectics and pragmatism: Being of consequence (pp. 119–144). Sage. Cite

Bohman, J. (2002). How to Make a Social Science Practical: Pragmatism, Critical Social Science and Multiperspectival Theory. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 31(3), 499–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310030701 Cite

Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. D. C Heath & Co. Cite

Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct. Henry Holt and Company. Cite

Dewey, J. (1916). Introduction to essays in experimental logic. The Middle Works of John Dewey, 10, 320–365. Cite

James, W., Dewey, J., Capps, J. M., & Capps, D. (2005). James and Dewey on Belief and Experience. University of Illinois Press. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=nTWJQVu5GycC Cite

Fairfield, P., Johnston, J. S., Rockmore, T., Good, J. A., Garrison, J., Allen, B., Margolis, J., Rosenthal, S. B., Bernstein, R. J., & Vessey, D. (2010). John Dewey and Continental Philosophy. Southern Illinois University Press. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zJjSa0lCdccC Cite

Bell, C. D. (2009). John Dewey and the Philosophy and Practice of Hope. Education & Culture, 25(1), 66–70. ehh. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=55403487&site=ehost-live Cite

Baldacchino, J. (2013). John Dewey: Liberty and the Pedagogy of Disposition. Springer Netherlands. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=KcPEBAAAQBAJ Cite

Dewey, J. (1884). Kant and the philosophic method. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 18(2), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/25668013 Cite

Bentley, A. F., & Dewey, J. (1949). Knowing and the known. Beacon Press. Cite

Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. Henry Holt and Company. Cite

Fishman, S. M., & McCarthy, L. (2005). Marcel and Dewey on hope: Radical differences, noteworthy similarities. Philosophy Today, 49(2), 184. http://uwe.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT8MwDI5gXHbh_RgDKT-AoqbpI-WCqjVVJ23r1BVN41I1TeC2wdiE-Pc4XTsBElw491LZ_hx_seMPIWrdmsaPnGC5jBauhOgB_sxcSQQUAt5TKQjQC0HFRohuENu9Ryf-8qi_dneTJavULRelvjUH2g5g1X25-5dXQ8tI6XZrramxi_aITXw94zck4batYLmb1Z8QyQZQI_e3PFwdLtEBavr_zVDJ-r154vV9Z-N_fvUQ7de1Jw42wXKEdtT8GLXHjZjBxwmKhkHa4wMcjEIc8imf4WSE42TM73AaVHsgcdiPIp7qi6nJDR4lGZ8maRbP8ASy4CBI-xnUl6foIeJZLzZqpQXjGY5_1_B9SSihnukrwLNlK2B1UjqFI3yprIJQKU0BLlTSY44qCwAt0YMTHviTCChqzlBrvpirC4QLU_qu1vljQNWoUxaCKcuxGLOpXVJVdtC5Nnmu8bNaFmVOKPPANh7poG5jvLwG0lu-tdzln1-7qF3tVK3maK9Qa7Vcq2tdLahPWbK34w Cite

Rorty, R. (1994). Michel Foucault. In B. Smart (Ed.), Ungrounded hope: Dewey vs. Focault (pp. 159–164). Routledge. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=n5L3hoMOcxwC Cite

Hall, J. N. (2013). Mixed methods and credibility of evidence in evaluation. In D. M. Mertens & S. Hesse-Biber (Eds.), Pragmatism, evidence, and mixed methods evaluation (pp. 15–26). Cite

Cherryholmes, C. H. (1994). More Notes on Pragmatism. Educational Researcher, 23(1), 16–18. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x023001016 Cite

Dewey, J. (1929). Nature, life and body-mind. Cite

Cherryholmes, C. H. (1992). Notes on Pragmatism and Scientific Realism. Educational Researcher, 21(6), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x021006013 Cite