
2885712 items 1 apa title asc 1 https://ladders4action.org/wp-content/plugins/zotpress/
Wagenaar, H. (2011). “A beckon to the makings, workings and doings of human beings”: The critical pragmatism of John Forester. Public Administration Review, 71(2), 293–298. Cite
Shyman, E. (2011). A Comparison of the Concepts of Democracy and Experience in a Sample of Major Works by Dewey and Freire. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 43(10), 1035–1046. ehh. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00625.x Cite
Talisse, R. B. (2011). A Farewell to Deweyan Democracy. Political Studies, 59(3), 509–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00860.x Cite
James, S. M. (1993). A possible Black feminist link to social transformation? Theorizing Black Feminisms: The Visionary Pragmatism of Black Women, 44. Cite
Glassman, M., Erdem, G., & Bartholomew, M. (2013). Action Research and Its History as an Adult Education Movement for Social Change. Adult Education Quarterly, 63(3), 272–288. ehh. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713612471418 Cite
Heikkinen, H. L. T., Huttunen, R., & Syrjälä, L. (2007). Action research as narrative: five principles for validation. Educational Action Research, 15(1), 5–19. ehh. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790601150709 Cite
Finger, M., & Asun, J. M. (2001). Adult Education at the Crossroads: Learning our way out. Zed Books and NIACE. https://studydirect.sussex.ac.uk/course/view.php?id=21916&topic=8 Cite
Frega, R. (2014). Between pragmatism and critical theory: Social philosophy today. Human Studies, 37(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-013-9290-0 Cite
Hildebrand, D. L. (2003). Beyond realism and antirealism: John Dewey and the neopragmatists. Vanderbilt University Press. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=N9PWAAAAMAAJ Cite
Antonio, R. J., & Kellner, D. (1992). Communication, modernity, and democracy in Habermas and Dewey. Symbolic Interaction, 15(3), 277–297. Cite
Dewey, J., Moore, A. W., Brown, H. C., Mead, G. H., Bode, B. H., Stuart, H. W., Tufts, J. H., & Kallen, H. M. (1917). Creative intelligence: Essays in the pragmatic attitude. H. Holt. https://ia802705.us.archive.org/9/items/creativeintellig00dewe/creativeintellig00dewe.pdf Cite
Midtgarden, T. (2012). Critical Pragmatism: Dewey’s social philosophy revisited. European Journal of Social Theory, 15(4), 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431011432373 Cite
Lovejoy, A. O. (1920). Critical realism: A co-operative study of the problem of knowledge. In D. Drake, A. O. Lovejoy, J. B. Pratt, A. K. Rogers, G. Santayana, R. W. Sellars, & C. A. Strong (Eds.), Pragmatism versus the pragmatist (pp. 35–84). http://www.archive.org/stream/essayscriticalre00unknuoft#page/34/mode/2up Cite
Shalin, D. M. (n.d.). Critical theory and the pragmatist challenge. http://cdclv.unlv.edu//pragmatism/shalin_ct.pdf Cite
Linh Chi, V. O., Mounoud, E., & Rose, J. (2012). Dealing with the opposition of rigor and relevance from Dewey’s pragmatist perspective. Management, 15(4), 367–390. buh. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26db%3dbuh%26AN%3d85136796%26site%3deds-live&group=trial Cite
Dewey, J. (1923). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Macmillan. Cite
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. The Macmillan Co. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jRFWAJJVE_EC Cite
Honneth, A. (1998). Democracy as reflexive cooperation: John Dewey and the theory of democracy today. Political Theory, 26(6), 763–783. Cite
Fesmire, S. (2014). Dewey. Routledge. Cite
Hildebrand, D. L. (2008). Dewey: A beginner’s guide. Oneworld Publications. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=sBHLJgwyuakC Cite
Willower, D. J. (1994). Dewey’s theory of inquiry and reflective administration. Journal of Educational Administration, 32(1), 05–22. Cite
Hansen, D. T. (2002). Dewey’s Conception of an Environment for Teaching and Learning. Curriculum Inquiry, 32(3), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-873X.00228 Cite
Colapietro, V. (2004). Doing—and undoing—the done thing: Dewey and Bourdieu on habituation, agency, and transformation. Contemporary Pragmatism, 1(2), 65–93. Cite
Dewey, J. (1938). Education and experience. Simon and Schuster. Cite
Zajda, J. I. (2001). Education and Society. James Nicholas Publishers. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=FPbcdfMFrckC Cite
Ghiraldelli, P. (n.d.). Educational Theory : Herbart, Dewey, Freire and Postmodernists. http://eepat.net/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=educational_theory.pdf Cite
Stewart, A. F. (1997). Elements of Knowledge: Pragmatism, Logic, and Inquiry. Vanderbilt University Press. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=0ntMa55fA6wC Cite
Dewey, J., Hester, D. M., & Talisse, R. B. (1916). Essays in experimental logic. SIU Press. Cite
Dewey, J. (1986). Experience and education. 50, 241–252. Cite
Dewey, J. (1925). Experience and nature. George Allen & Unwin Ltd. Cite
Cohan, A., & Howlett, C. F. (2017). GLOBAL CONFLICTS SHATTERED WORLD PEACE: JOHN DEWEY’S INFLUENCE ON PEACE EDUCATORS AND PRACTITIONERS. Education & Culture, 33(1), 59–88. ehh. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26db%3dehh%26AN%3d124508878%26site%3deds-live&group=trial Cite
Aboulafia, M., Bookman, M., & Kemp, C. (2012). Habermas and Pragmatism. Taylor & Francis. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=gi0VwiGNXKMC Cite
Greene, J. C., & Hall, J. N. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Dialectics and pragmatism: Being of consequence (pp. 119–144). Sage. Cite
Bohman, J. (2002). How to Make a Social Science Practical: Pragmatism, Critical Social Science and Multiperspectival Theory. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 31(3), 499–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310030701 Cite
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. D. C Heath & Co. Cite
Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct. Henry Holt and Company. Cite
Dewey, J. (1916). Introduction to essays in experimental logic. The Middle Works of John Dewey, 10, 320–365. Cite
James, W., Dewey, J., Capps, J. M., & Capps, D. (2005). James and Dewey on Belief and Experience. University of Illinois Press. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=nTWJQVu5GycC Cite
Fairfield, P., Johnston, J. S., Rockmore, T., Good, J. A., Garrison, J., Allen, B., Margolis, J., Rosenthal, S. B., Bernstein, R. J., & Vessey, D. (2010). John Dewey and Continental Philosophy. Southern Illinois University Press. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zJjSa0lCdccC Cite
Bell, C. D. (2009). John Dewey and the Philosophy and Practice of Hope. Education & Culture, 25(1), 66–70. ehh. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=55403487&site=ehost-live Cite
Baldacchino, J. (2013). John Dewey: Liberty and the Pedagogy of Disposition. Springer Netherlands. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=KcPEBAAAQBAJ Cite
Dewey, J. (1884). Kant and the philosophic method. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 18(2), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/25668013 Cite
Bentley, A. F., & Dewey, J. (1949). Knowing and the known. Beacon Press. Cite
Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. Henry Holt and Company. Cite
Fishman, S. M., & McCarthy, L. (2005). Marcel and Dewey on hope: Radical differences, noteworthy similarities. Philosophy Today, 49(2), 184. http://uwe.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT8MwDI5gXHbh_RgDKT-AoqbpI-WCqjVVJ23r1BVN41I1TeC2wdiE-Pc4XTsBElw491LZ_hx_seMPIWrdmsaPnGC5jBauhOgB_sxcSQQUAt5TKQjQC0HFRohuENu9Ryf-8qi_dneTJavULRelvjUH2g5g1X25-5dXQ8tI6XZrramxi_aITXw94zck4batYLmb1Z8QyQZQI_e3PFwdLtEBavr_zVDJ-r154vV9Z-N_fvUQ7de1Jw42wXKEdtT8GLXHjZjBxwmKhkHa4wMcjEIc8imf4WSE42TM73AaVHsgcdiPIp7qi6nJDR4lGZ8maRbP8ASy4CBI-xnUl6foIeJZLzZqpQXjGY5_1_B9SSihnukrwLNlK2B1UjqFI3yprIJQKU0BLlTSY44qCwAt0YMTHviTCChqzlBrvpirC4QLU_qu1vljQNWoUxaCKcuxGLOpXVJVdtC5Nnmu8bNaFmVOKPPANh7poG5jvLwG0lu-tdzln1-7qF3tVK3maK9Qa7Vcq2tdLahPWbK34w Cite
Rorty, R. (1994). Michel Foucault. In B. Smart (Ed.), Ungrounded hope: Dewey vs. Focault (pp. 159–164). Routledge. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=n5L3hoMOcxwC Cite
Hall, J. N. (2013). Mixed methods and credibility of evidence in evaluation. In D. M. Mertens & S. Hesse-Biber (Eds.), Pragmatism, evidence, and mixed methods evaluation (pp. 15–26). Cite
Cherryholmes, C. H. (1994). More Notes on Pragmatism. Educational Researcher, 23(1), 16–18. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x023001016 Cite
Dewey, J. (1929). Nature, life and body-mind. Cite
Cherryholmes, C. H. (1992). Notes on Pragmatism and Scientific Realism. Educational Researcher, 21(6), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x021006013 Cite
- Knowledge Hubs
- Sex, Fertility, Pregnancy & Childbirth
- Adoption & Fostering
- Museums & Heritage Sector
- Education – Children & Young People
- Work, Business & enterprise
- Universities, Research & Higher Education
- UK Charity Sector
- Sustainability, Animals, Agriculture & Environment
- Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (STEM)
- Politics, Advocacy & Social Justice
- Policing & law
- NHS and Healthcare
- International Development & Aid
- Inclusive Accountability
- Immigration, The Windrush Period & Asylum
- Leadership
- Insight Hubs
- Resource Hubs
- Toolkits